Tuesday, January 14 Updated: March 27, 5:38 PM ET Florida Marlins By John Sickels Special to ESPN.com |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 in review
What went wrong?
In retrospect, the critical decisions were: 2. The heavy reliance on young pitching is a double-edged sword. Burnett, Beckett, and Penny all have ace potential, but all have had a hard time staying healthy. 3. The trades of Floyd and Ryan Dempster were frustrating to fans still haunted by the ghosts of past betrayals. But the Marlins seemed to get good value in return.
Looking ahead to 2003
2. With all the emphasis on the pitching staff, it looks like the offense is being neglected. Letting Millar go to Japan robs Florida of its best overall hitter. Lee and Lowell are good hitters, and Castillo is disruptive at the top of the order, but that trio can't carry the team by itself. An outfield of Todd Hollandsworth, Juan Pierre, and Juan Encarnacion is hardly contention material. Any gains in pitching may be offset by problems with the hitting attack. 3. Ownership, stadium, and attendance issues continue to hover over this club. As stated above, this should be a good market, but the fact that it isn't has more to do with the way the club has been run since 1997, than it does with anything wrong with the fans. Is Loria the right owner to bind the PR wounds that MLB inflicted on itself in South Florida?
Can expect to play better
Can expect to play worse
Projected lineup
Rotation
Closer
A closer look First of all, Beckett was far from a failure. Being limited to 21 starts by blisters hurt his "counting stats," but on a per-inning basis, he did just fine, posting a 113/44 K/BB ratio in 108 innings. If the blisters hadn't intervened and he'd thrown, say, 190 innings while maintaining the same strikeout rate, he'd have been close to 200 Ks, and the casual fan would have a better sense of exactly how dominating Beckett is. Anyone who can strike out a hitter-per-inning in the major leagues at age 22, while showing reasonable control, is a special pitcher. His K/IP mark was fifth-best in the National League, 40 percent better than his peers. Only Randy Johnson, Mark Prior, Curt Schilling, and Jason Schmidt were better. Secondly, Beckett's component numbers, his hits, extra-base hits, and walks given up, imply performance better than what his ERA actually turned out to be. His "expected ERA" (xERA) was almost 40 points better than his "real" ERA. Fantasy expert Ron Shandler, in his excellent 2003 Baseball Forecaster, figures Beckett's 2002 Expected ERA at 3.77, rather than the 4.12 he actually recorded. A pitcher with an xERA significantly better than his real ERA is a good bet to improve the following year, since the disappointing ERA is usually a result of bad luck, weak teammates, or both. Adjusted for league and park context, Beckett's real ERA was three percent worse than the National League average last year. But if his ERA had been closer to his xERA, it would have been slightly better than league, another good sign for a pitcher his age. Basically, there is nothing wrong with Josh Beckett that more experience won't cure. He's already got one of the best statistical sets in baseball, in terms of K/IP, and his control is improving. The objective numbers line up quite nicely with his subjective scouting reports, which remain uniformly positive. Scouts remain intrigued with his excellent fastball, and infatuated with his big curve. But the bugaboo, of course, is health. Can Beckett stay healthy long enough to make the final adjustments and emerge as one of the best pitchers in baseball? Last year's blister problems were certainly annoying. However, blister problems aren't bad compared to, say, a blown elbow or a shredded shoulder. The blisters kept him to 108 innings, highly irritating for heavily-invested fantasy owners, but good in the sense that it kept him from being overworked. Beckett had shoulder trouble in the minor leagues, and although surgery was avoided, keeping him healthy must be an absolute priority for the Marlins. They talk a good game about it, but it can be awfully tempting to leave Beckett in the game when he's got his good stuff going, even beyond the point of prudence. Josh Beckett didn't quite live up to expectations last year because he's a human being, and expectations were probably too great to begin with. But he did better than people think, and all the signs, statistical and otherwise, point to stardom just around the corner. All he needs is some finishing polish, and good health. Assuming the blisters can be dealt with, Beckett could emerge as a true dominator at any time. How will manager Jeff Torborg respond to this if/when it happens? Will the Marlins expect Beckett to shoulder an ace-like workload if he starts pitching like an ace on a per-inning basis? If they do, they increase the risk that he'll get hurt. How Torborg responds to this challenge will be a crucial test of his managerial skill. Even if the Marlins do the right thing and keep Beckett's workload reasonable, it doesn't guarantee that he won't get hurt. But that doesn't make it any less imperative to take good care of this crown jewel. John Sickels is the author of the 2002 Minor League Scouting Notebook, and is now working on the 2003 Baseball Prospect Book. His biography of Bob Feller will be published next spring. He lives in Lawrence, Kansas, with his wife, son, and two cats. You can send John questions or comments at JASickels@aol.com, or you can visit his homepage at JohnSickels.com. |
|