![]() |
|
| Sunday, September 5 Updated: September 6, 11:46 AM ET The Fans Speak -- Week 2 ESPN.com |
|||||||||
|
The first full weekend of the 1999 college football season came like a safety blitz: a full-speed assault capable of taking your head off. And that was the good part. There were other aspects of the weekend that were not so positive, both on and off the field. As always, we opened the Fan Mailbag this week. Here's a sampling of fan opinion from Saturday, Sept. 4:
Big game aftermath
I don't want to hear anyone complain about the Michigan-Notre Dame game. Notre Dame people can complain all they want but they had three costly turnovers and no one to blame for the loss but themselves and Michigan's superior play.
As we have seen in the past, the emphasis on excessive celebration is a travesty -- most recently exemplified by the "moose" thingy performed by the Notre Dame player after an excellent touchdown. It was a shame for such an exciting game to be marred by an inane penalty costing a good team a touchdown, and potentially costing them the game.
It's a shame when officials take it upon themselves to decide
the outcome of a game, especially a game so rich in tradition
and important as the Notre Dame-Michigan game on Saturday.
As a student at the University of Notre Dame,you might take
my comments as biased -- more a reflection of anger and disappointment
than objective analysis. However,the camera doesn't lie. ... The game
could have had one of the all-time great endings. The officials ruined those prospects.
Yes, Notre Dame lost to Michigan this past weekend. It was a great game to watch between two great programs BUT the call at the end of the game for "excessive celebrating" was in itself a bit excessive. I wonder if the Wolverines opened the card before accepting the officials' gift.
After watching the Notre Dame-Michigan game I have come to one conclusion about college football: They need to do the same thing the NFL has done and get instant replay.
Michigan rules!
A taste of the Rockies
Most news coverage of the CSU-CU game depicted a riot among CSU fans following our monumental win and the police response being justified. Having sat there in that crowd, this truly disgusts me. While it is evident that items were being thrown at the police, they were nothing more then plastic bottles and cups and never represented a threat to anyone's safety. And as to rushing the field, while there was talk of such, the whole subject ended as talk with the appearance of riot police. There was never a rush and never a true threat to the police or to the safety of those on the field -- until the police began mass sprayings of the crowd with mace and pepper spray. The threat to the crowd then occurred as people stampeded out of the stadium, tripping and falling over each other in their efforts to find some breathable air. And those were the lucky fans, as I saw many that never got a chance to leave their seats as they were hunched over shaking from the high concentrations of gas, but were still continuously sprayed with new doses. The only danger to the safety of anyone in that stadium came from the Denver police. I hope that the record will soon be set straight.
Colorado-Colorado State was one of those tragedies that seems to pop up every year in college football about fans rushing the field. Yes, it is expensive to replace goalposts and turf, but it is not worth the possible cost of human injury to bring out a SWAT team or erect a fence that can collapse or crush people. In five years of Notre Dame football, I never saw more than a twisted ankle from rushing the field four times (even in the mass of humanity after the Florida State-ND game in 1993) because the stadium is built in such a way that there are no major impediments to people rushing the field. Outside of constructing every stadium like East Lansing (with a 10-foot drop to cement-like astroturf) I don't see how anyone in college football thinks that they can stop it.
I was very happy that Colorado showed the whole country that they still suck!
Poll problems
Tennessee is still No. 1.
Well, another year, another bunch of fools making up the rankings. How can Penn St. not be ranked number one? It does not make sense to me or any other college football fan outside of the state of Florida. The Lions destroyed, dismantled and embarrassed an Arizona team that is virtually the same as last year's, 41-7. The Seminoles, on the other hand, shlacked a Louisiana Tech team by the score of, what was it, 41-7? What was 'zona's record last year? 12-1? How about La. Tech? 6-6. Who am I kidding. The same thing happens every year.
I can't understand why the Miami Hurricanes dropped in the polls. They didn't play any lesser an opponent than Penn State, or Florida. Being a Cane fan for many years, it seems to me, that the pollsters and the NCAA have a personal vendetta against Miami. Let's see what sanctions are brought against Notre Dame. All things will change on Sept.18.
Heisman hype
I would like to say that Peter Warrick's decision to stay in school and try to win a national championship for him and his team instead of going to the NFL and taking the millions, shows that he is very mature beyond his years, and it also shows that he has the foundation to be one of the greatest receivers of all time.
Purdue's QB Drew Brees looked poised for another great season. He will tear Notre Dame's secondary apart. Look for a big game against Michigan from him too, because Notre Dame passed the ball well against them.
I really believe that this is a year someone from a less-heralded program will truly be recognized as the top player in the country. The bias against defensive players has finally been put to rest. Now how about the one attached to Top 25 programs? If Saturday is any clue, Chris Redman of Louisville is my choice to win the Heisman.
This and that ...
Once again I am proven wrong about Auburn football. Yes, it can get worse: Auburn 22, Appalachian St. 15. They had to pull it out in the last minute. They are a disgrace to their fans and to the SEC.
The Virginia Tech Hokies were unstoppable and looked very good even without phenom quarterback Michael Vick for the majority of the game. Though the Hokies may have a "light" schedule compared to other college powerhouses, it's my opinion that Va. Tech has arrived.
Way to go Hoos!!! There is nothing better than beating the Tar Heels at home.
Scoreboard watching
Am I the only one that thinks the late touchdowns by Tennessee and Texas A&M (I believe with 22 seconds and 47 seconds left respectively) demonstrated a complete lack of class? I didn't see the A&M touchdown, so I say that with reservation, but Fulmer THROWING the football with less than 30 seconds left and up by 18 points?!?! I understand the "margin of victory" for the BCS, etc, etc, blah, blah, blah. But if you want to get into the BCS, just win all your games and everything else will take care of itself, especially if you're already ranked in the top 5!! Besides, I'd rather miss out on the BCS and keep my integrity than sell my soul for a computer formula. I, for one, lost a tremendous amount of respect for Mr. Fulmer and I never had any for Mr. Slocum (and no, I'm not a U of Texas grad).
Pac-10 pride
The Pac-10 definitely has more too prove this year, as the rest of the NCAA looks very impressive, but it remains to be seen if we can step up and compete with the rest of the nation.
Granted, it was Hawaii, but of all the top 25 vs. patsy-team games this weekend, did anyone dominate like USC? Not in the margin of victory category. Could this be the beginning of a return to Trojan glory? There's just something about this team ...
MAC power
Marshall's victory at Clemson was miraculous considering their short time in I-A. That program is a Cinderella story of mythic proportions.
Chad Pennington's engineering of the winning TD drive was a classic for football annals.
Raking leaves this fall |
|
||||||||