![]() |
| Thursday, March 14 Rockies say they're in violation of league debt rule Associated Press |
|||||||||||||||
|
DENVER -- Despite cutting their payroll in the offseason, the Colorado Rockies have more debt than the league permits and could be fined or lose television revenue.
Rockies managing general partner Jerry McMorris said several expensive long-term contracts meant the Rockies were not in compliance with the league debt rule, the Rocky Mountain News reported Thursday from Tucson, Ariz., where the Rockies are holding their training camp.
Teams must meet the debt-ratio rule by June 1 or risk being fined, losing their share of national broadcast payments or being placed in trusteeship. The league requires that a team's debt be 40 percent or less of its franchise value.
This is the first year the Rockies will have a smaller payroll than the year before. Anticipated payroll this year is $47 million, down from $65 million last year.
McMorris would not discuss specifics, but said the Rockies were carrying debt in addition to the long-term contract commitments to players.
According to the debt ratio rule, which only recently commissioner Bud Selig said will now be enforced, a team's debts include stadium debts, loans to club owners and the present-day value of long-term player contracts. A team's value, according to a letter Selig sent owners recently, is double its annual revenues (although teams can use an outside appraisal).
By using the revenue figures Selig presented to Congress during the offseason, the Rockies' revenues in 2001 were $121 million, which would give the franchise a value of $242 million.
In addition to an anticipated payroll of $47 million for the 2002 season, the Rockies have $344.1 million committed beyond the current season in long-term contracts to six players.
`"We took steps this winter to get in compliance, but we have a considerable ways to go," McMorris said. "We don't consider ourselves a franchise in jeopardy, but we definitely have a tremendous amount of long-term commitments that we have to work through."
The Major League Baseball Players Association is expected to challenge Selig's decision to enforce the debt ratio, claiming that making teams adhere to the rule will lower the amount of money teams can spend on player salaries.
|
| ||||||||||||||