Rob Neyer

MLB | GameCast
Scores | RealTime Insider
Schedule
Pitching Probables
Standings | Grid
Stats | Stat Pack
Players
Transactions
Injuries: AL | NL
Minor Leagues
MLB en espanol
Message Board
CLUBHOUSE


FEATURES
Park Factors
News Wire
Daily Glance
History
MLB Insider


FANTASY BASEBALL
Player News | Rater
Daily Fantasy Buzz
Out of the Box
ESPN MALL
TeamStore
ESPN Auctions
SPORT SECTIONS
Wednesday, December 18
 
At the present, Braves' pitching falls short

By Rob Neyer
ESPN.com

Here's what the Atlanta Braves' pitching rotation looked like at the conclusion of the 2002 regular season (including statistics from starts only):

 
           W- L   ERA   IP     K   BB 
Maddux    16- 6  2.62  199.1  118  45 
Glavine   18-11  2.96  224.2  127  78 
Millwood  17- 8  3.25  213    176  63 
D. Moss   12- 6  3.50  175    107  89 
Marquis    8- 9  5.04  114.1   84  49 
  Totals  71-40  3.31  926.1  612 324 

Pretty good, huh? Even when you throw in the disaster known as Albie Lopez ($4 million, 7.11 ERA in four starts), Atlanta's starters posted a 3.42 ERA, the best in the major leagues. As you've probably heard, though, the Braves' rotation looks quite a bit different today...

 
           W- L   ERA   IP     K   BB 
Millwood  17- 8  3.25  213    176  63 
R. Ortiz  14-10  3.61  214.1  137  94 
P. Byrd   17-11  3.90  228.1  129  38 
Hampton    7-15  6.15  178.2   74  91 
Marquis    8- 9  5.04  114.1   84  49 
  Totals  63-53  4.25  948.2  600 335 

Kevin Millwood might become a real ace in 2003, but it's pretty hard to get excited about those other fellows.

When Braves GM John Schuerholz looks at Russ Ortiz, he sees a pitcher with the "ability to be a top-of-the-rotation starter," but what I see is a guy with a so-so strikeout rate and a 4.48 ERA over the last three seasons when not pitching in the friendly expanses of Pacific Bell Park.

When Schuerholz looks at Paul Byrd, he sees a pitcher who won 17 games for a pretty awful team last season. But what I see is an aging pitcher with a lousy strikeout rate and a scary injury history.

Without (Greg) Maddux, the Braves need (Kevin)Millwood to take over for Maddux, (John) Smoltz to take over for (Tom) Glavine, (Russ) Ortiz to take over for Millwood ... which is where this breaks down, because Millwood was the best No. 3 starter in the majors last year, and Russ Ortiz simply doesn't have that kind of stuff.

When Schuerholz looks at Mike Hampton ... well, I don't know what he sees. I guess I should ask, but his answers to similar questions haven't been particularly enlightening. I guess he sees a pitcher who was good once, and might be again after being liberated from Coors Field. But what I see is a guy who, if he turns things around, should put pitching coach Leo Mazzone in the Hall of Fame.

A couple of weeks ago, I wrote of the Braves, "They had a good run. But unless John Schuerholz does a lot of good work between now and Opening Day, the run is done."

Well, to this point he's done some good work, but not a lot. At this moment, the Braves still have big holes at first base, second base, third base, and behind the plate. And their shortstop ain't exactly lighting up the scoreboard, either.

It's simple. The Braves need Greg Maddux or a reasonable facsimile thereof. Because with the lineup they've got right now, one great starter (Millwood) and three or four decent ones just isn't going to be enough. So if Maddux doesn't come back, John Smoltz has to dust off his first-inning cleats and get ready to pitch 200 innings.

Of course, sending Smoltz back to the rotation carries some risks. For one thing, it would weaken an already-weakened Braves bullpen. And for another, there's no way to know if Smoltz's body can withstand a starter's workload, considering he hasn't pitched 200 innings in a season since 1997.

But without Maddux, the Braves need Millwood to take over for Maddux, Smoltz to take over for Glavine, Ortiz to take over for Millwood ... which is where this breaks down, because Millwood was the best No. 3 starter in the majors last year, and Russ Ortiz simply doesn't have that kind of stuff. But Ortiz-Byrd-Hampton in 2003 could be as good as Millwood-Moss-Marquis in 2002. It's not likely, because Hampton's a huge question mark and Ortiz really isn't any better than Moss. But it's possible.

On the other hand, if Maddux accepts the Braves' offer of arbitration and returns, the rotation looks great and Schuerholz has six starters (not including Smoltz), one of whom he could presumably convert into the first or second baseman they so desperately need.

But as things stand today, there's still work to be done. And so I'm still picking the field against the Braves in the National League East.

Senior writer Rob Neyer, whose Big Book of Baseball Lineups will be published next spring by Fireside, will be appearing here regularly and irregularly during the offseason. His e-mail address is rob.neyer@dig.com.





 More from ESPN...
Braves remake staff with Ortiz acquisition, Byrd deal
Quickly remaking their ...

Rob Neyer home page
Everything you ever wanted to ...

Rob Neyer Archive



 ESPN Tools
Email story
 
Most sent
 
Print story
 
Daily email