Off Base

Jim Caple

Keyword
MLB
Scores
Schedule
Pitching Probables
Standings
Statistics
Transactions
Injuries: AL | NL
Players
Power Alley
Free Agents
All-Time Stats
Message Board
Minor Leagues
MLB en espanol
CLUBHOUSE


THE ROSTER
Dave Campbell
Jim Caple
Peter Gammons
Joe Morgan
Rob Neyer
John Sickels
Jayson Stark
ESPN MALL
TeamStore
ESPN Auctions
SPORT SECTIONS
Thursday, December 5
 
Hall should keep five-year wait for all players

By Jim Caple
ESPN.com

Hall of Fame ballots went out this week and there is an interesting name among all the others. Darryl Kile.

Normally, a player must wait five years before becoming eligible for the Hall of Fame but baseball makes an exception for players who die during their careers. Kile is the fourth player thus affected -- the others were Lou Gehrig (who died two years after his career ended), Roberto Clemente and Thurman Munson.

The five-year waiting period is beneficial for two reasons. One, it generally prevents the awkward situation of a player coming out of retirement after he's been elected to the Hall of Fame -- which was the case with Mario Lemiux in hockey -- or having him come out of retirement and pad his resume after voters have already rejected him (I say "generally'' because Jose Rijo came out of retirement after he had already been on the ballot). Indeed, the rule was initially constructed to prevent the problem of players coming out of retirement.

Clearly, a dead player is not coming out of retirement, so voters don't need to worry about a comeback. But lifting the five-year waiting period does present the possibility of a voter being swayed by sentimental reasons.

And that doesn't apply only to players who die. The five-year waiting period provides a needed perspective on a player's career. It's only natural to feel more favorably about a player when you're caught up in the sadness of just seeing him retire. You tend to think of him as better than he really was.

Ryne Sandberg, who also is on the ballot for the first time, is an excellent example. When he retired the first time in 1994, I definitely would have voted him in without a second thought. But after he had a couple mediocre seasons when he came out of retirement (what is it about Chicago players and not being able to make up their minds?), my thoughts changed a little bit about his career.

I'll still vote for Sandberg but the point is, like a Monet painting, you see a player's career more clearly from a distance. Which is why all players, living or dead, should be subject to the waiting period.

Clearly, the Kile situation isn't a big problem. Fortunately, active players do not die very often and so far the only ones who were put into Cooperstown early -- Gehrig and Clemente -- would have made it easily anyway. And Kile isn't going to get in no matter how sad anyone feels about his death. Still, there seems to be no compelling reason to make an exception.

Will seeing Kile not get any votes next month make his family feel better about their loss in any way? No. Is there the potential for a problem in the future? Yes, even though it is slight. But better to head off a potential problem before it develops than wait until it does.

  • Of the players on the ballot for the first time, Eddie Murray is the easiest vote, followed by Sandberg. Both belong in. Murray's credentials -- 500 home runs and 3,000 hits, accomplished when those marks still really meant something -- are impeccable. Sandberg, prior to his disappointing comeback, was the league's best second baseman for years (Robbie Alomar's best seasons have been in the American League).

  • Lee Smith is a harder case. Yes, he is the all-time saves leader but the save may be the most overrated stat in baseball. He also earned more than 200 of those saves after the closer had become a one-inning wonder. And while Smith was very good for a lot of years, few people ever felt the game was flat out over when he took the mound the way they did with Goose Gossage, Dennis Eckersley or do with Mariano Rivera.

  • Fernando Valenzuela is the only other new name that merits consideration but he falls short. He was great his first couple seasons, but he had only seven winning seasons after his rookie year and wasn't much more than a .500 pitcher (173-153) for his career.

    Jim Caple is a senior writer for ESPN.com. He can be reached at cuffscaple@hotmail.com.







  •  More from ESPN...
    Kurkjian: Murray's spot in Cooperstown secure
    The folks who vote for the ...
    Jim Caple Archive

     ESPN Tools
    Email story
     
    Most sent
     
    Print story
     
    Daily email